What s in a name said the bard? And we now know that he was, at least on this
occasion, far removed from the reality. Name!!! Of course it is important. Very
important. Imagine being stuck with a nomenclature which does not ooze class or
style from every alphabet. Or being called out loudly in an ‘up market’
gathering with a ‘down market’ brand name?? Haven’t you heard of that young man
who cringed every time he was addressed by his very holy name “SaDayan”
lovingly given to him by his pious parents as a mark of devotion to the family
deity? Or the young lady who contemplated suicide because she was branded for
life with a ‘oh so vernacular’ Akhilandeshwari? And of course you have heard of
Aayush who though very happy with a modern sounding and suitably ethnic-chic
name, was so annoyed at friends in school calling him ‘Aai’! (For the
uninitiated, ‘Aai’ in Tamil is what you flush out every morning , Welcome!)
Innumerous are the cases where notices are filed on hourly
basis with notaries across the country for a ‘Change of Name’. If you don’t believe me, try browsing through
the classified advertisement page of your newspaper. It is nothing but the case
of taking matters in one’s own hands because you don’t want to be stuck to the
misguided decisions of your parents who had no clue of what branding and brand
equity is all about. There is an instance that I had read about where the young
daughter fought with her parents and won the right to change her name to
“Nayantara” after her favorite film star, much to the dismay of them who
thought the entire exercise was one of needless blackmailing. Especially, when
she had a perfectly divine and pure Tamil name in ‘Kuzhalvaimozhi’. I must
confess though that I am yet to hear of a case of anyone converting to
Christianity or Islam because they love Michel Jackson or Salman Khan.
My tryst with name/names took a turn to the serious once I
reached Kolkata during the Bharat Darshan as we kids in the family used to call
my father’s frequent transfers. (It was called Calcutta those days but we will
let it pass! And Since many dialogues in this paragraph are in Bengali , the translations
are in the bracket, “We never disappoint our readers” being my motto). On day
one, the gentle landlady caught me with a “Tomar naam ki?” (What is your name?)
Anand I said. “Eto choto naam ?” She said (Such a short name?). Anand Natarajan I said. “Kintu title ta kee?”
She persisted. (What is your title?) That stumped me as cleanly as Thala M S
Dhoni behind the wickets. This called for research I thought and embarked on one.
The data was quite revealing to say the least. For those not accustomed to Bengalispeak, “Title” is not anything like the one conferred on Sir Garfield Sobers by the Queen or the Padma Bhushan conferred on Rahul Dravid. It is not even the King Khan, Ulaganayagan kind of signatures bestowed by lazy film journos. “Title” to cut the story short is nothing but ones surname. My research into Bengali names delivered gems like the following:
This called for research....... |
The data was quite revealing to say the least. For those not accustomed to Bengalispeak, “Title” is not anything like the one conferred on Sir Garfield Sobers by the Queen or the Padma Bhushan conferred on Rahul Dravid. It is not even the King Khan, Ulaganayagan kind of signatures bestowed by lazy film journos. “Title” to cut the story short is nothing but ones surname. My research into Bengali names delivered gems like the following:
1.
Most Bengali names are not authentic Bengali if
they do not have three parts. Example Swapan Chandra Dey, Indra Mohan Kundu,
Uttam Kumar Haldar i.e., First name, Middle name, “Title”.
2.
“Titles” among Bengalis are as many as the pot
holes on the Kolkata roads which in the last count were…………you get the drift I
am sure.
3.
You have titles which are pan India in nature
like, Pal, Sinha, Roy etc.
4.
Two-in-one titles like Roy-Chowdhury,
Dutta-Gupta, Das-Gupta.
5.
Titles with hangover of the Raj where
Chattopadhyay, Mukhopadhyay, Gangopadhyay became Chatterjee, Mukherjee and
Ganguly because the Brits couldn’t pronounce the original. (Forget Dada my
Madrasi friends, you aint no fan of his if you cannot pronounce Saurab Chandi
Gangopadhyay).
Armed with the above knowledge I prepared myself with my
‘puro naam’ and was ready for that eventual question which will pop up with
regularity. Below is a verbatim version of my subsequent interview with a soon-to-be
friend:
He: Tomar Naam Ki?
Me: Anand.
H: Eto Choto naam?
M: Anand Natarajan.
H: Title ta ki?
M: No title.
H: Ki kore shombhob? Puro naam ta bolo title shaho! (Can’t
be, entire name please with title)
M: Keezhambur Ramaier Srinivasa Nataraja Anand Aiyer!
H: Eto boro naam! (Such a long
name!)
Very good build up.
ReplyDeleteWonderful climax.
Way to go!
:)
Jay
Hmmmmmmnnnnn aaaaeta ki kalponik...
ReplyDeleteKichuta kalponik. Docu-drama moto! Shesher interview ta bahu baar ghoteche aamar sathe!
Delete